Ordered weighted average based grouping of nanomaterials with Arsinh and dose response similarity models.

In the context of the EU GRACIOUS project, we propose a novel procedure for similarity assessment and grouping of nanomaterials. This methodology is based on the (1) Arsinh transformation function for scalar properties, (2) full curve shape comparison by application of a modified Kolmogorov-Smirnov metric for bivariate properties, (3) Ordered Weighted Average (OWA) aggregation-based grouping distance, and (4) hierarchical clustering. The approach allows for grouping of nanomaterials that is not affected by the dataset, so that group membership will not change when new candidates are included in the set of assessed materials. To facilitate the application of the proposed methodology, a software script was developed by using the R programming language which is currently under migration to a web tool. The presented approach was tested against a dataset, derived from literature review, related to immobilization of Daphnia magna and reporting information on several nanomaterials and properties.

Bayesian based similarity assessment of nanomaterials to inform grouping.

Nanoforms can be manufactured in plenty of variants by differing their physicochemical properties and toxicokinetic behaviour which can affect their hazard potential. To avoid testing of each single nanomaterial and nanoform variation and subsequently save resources, grouping and read-across strategies are used to estimate groups of substances, based on carefully selected evidence, that could potentially have similar human health and environmental hazard impact. A novel computational similarity method is presented aiming to compare dose-response curves and identify sets of similar nanoforms. The suggested method estimates the statistical model that best fits the data by leveraging pairwise Bayes Factor analysis to compare pairs of curves and evaluate whether each of the nanoforms is sufficiently similar to all other nanoforms. Pairwise comparisons to benchmark materials are used to define threshold similarity values and set the criteria for identifying groups of nanoforms with comparatively similar toxicity. Applications to use case data are shown to demonstrate that the method can support grouping hypotheses linked to a certain hazard endpoint and route of exposure.

A methodology for the automatic evaluation of data quality and completeness of nanomaterials for risk assessment purposes.

This manuscript proposes a methodology to assess the completeness and quality of physicochemical and hazard datasets for risk assessment purposes. The approach is also specifically applicable to similarity assessment as a basis for grouping of (nanoforms of) chemical substances as well as for classification of the substances according to the Classification, Labeling and Packaging regulation. The unique goal of this approach is to assess data quality in such a way that all the steps are automatized, thus reducing reliance on expert judgment. The analysis starts from available (meta)data as provided in the data entry templates developed by the NanoSafety community and used for import into the eNanoMapper database. The methodology is implemented in the templates as a traffic light system-the providers of the data can see in real time the completeness scores calculated by the system for their datasets in green, yellow, or red. This is an interactive feedback feature that is intended to provide an incentive for anyone inserting data into the database to deliver more complete and higher quality datasets. The users of the data can also see this information both in the data entry templates and on the database interface, which enables them to select better datasets for their assessments. The proposed methodology has been partially implemented in the eNanoMapper database and in a Weight of Evidence approach for the regulatory classification of nanomaterials. It was fully implemented in a publicly available online R tool.

Colloidal stability classification of TiO2 nanoparticles in artificial and in natural waters by cluster analysis and a global stability index: Influence of standard and natural colloidal particles.

In the field of exposure-driven risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles (NPs), the highly complex interactions of NPs with natural components in surface waters are considered key factors to understand their fate and behavior in the environment. However, since experimental approaches aiming at imitating environmentally relevant conditions include many parameters and lead to a high number of outcomes, statistical tools can be extremely useful to support the results' interpretation. In this context, a multimethod approach was applied to investigate the colloidal behavior of TiO2 NPs in both artificial waters and natural brackish water (from the Venice lagoon, Italy), in the presence of standard kaolinite and natural organic matter (NOM), or of the fine fraction of natural colloidal particles (NCPs) from the lagoon sediment. In detail, the experimental data obtained, i.e. hydrodynamic size, surface charge and sedimentation velocity values, were i) statistically treated by hierarchical clustering and ii) merged into a global stability index (IG). The hierarchical clustering allowed to group the dispersions into three colloidal stability classes, where the main discriminant was the medium composition (i.e. ionic strength and presence of NOM), while the IG allowed to establish a colloidal stability ranking of the dispersions within each class. Moreover, the comparison among the different dispersions suggested that kaolinite could be considered as a suitable surrogate for NCPs, to estimate the colloidal behavior and environmental fate of TiO2 NPs in natural aqueous media.

Novel multimethod approach for the determination of the colloidal stability of nanomaterials in complex environmental mixtures using a global stability index: TiO2 as case study.

A systematic study on the colloidal behavior of uncoated and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) coated TiO2 engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) in simulated aqueous media is herein reported, in which conditions representative for natural waters (pH, presence of divalent electrolytes (i.e. Ca2+/Mg2+ and SO42-), of natural organic matter (NOM) and of suspended particulate matter (SPM)) were systematically varied. The colloidal stability of the different dispersions was investigated by means of Dynamic and Electrophoretic Light Scattering (DLS and ELS) and Centrifugal Separation Analysis (CSA), and a global stability index based on these three techniques was developed. The index allows to quantitatively classify the nano-based dispersions according to their colloidal stability affected by the different parameters studied. This multimethod approach clearly identifies inorganic SPM followed by divalent electrolytes as the main natural components destabilizing TiO2 ENMs upon entering in simulated natural waters, while it highlights a moderate stabilization induced by NOM, depending mainly on pH. Moreover, the PVP coating was found to attenuate the influence of these parameters on the colloidal stability. The obtained results show how the global stability index developed is influenced by the complexity of the system, suggesting the importance of combining the information gathered from all the techniques employed to better elucidate the fate and behavior of ENMs in natural surface waters.

A Weight of Evidence approach to classify nanomaterials according to the EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation criteria.

In the context of the European Union (EU) Horizon 2020 GRACIOUS project (Grouping, Read-Across, Characterisation and classification framework for regulatory risk assessment of manufactured nanomaterials and Safer design of nano-enabled products), we proposed a quantitative Weight of Evidence (WoE) approach for hazard classification of nanomaterials (NMs). This approach is based on the requirements of the European Regulation on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (the CLP regulation), which implements the United Nations' Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (UN GHS) in the European Union. The goal of this WoE methodology is to facilitate classification of NMs according to CLP criteria, following the decision trees defined in ECHA's CLP regulatory guidance. In the WoE, results from heterogeneous studies are weighted according to data quality and completeness criteria, integrated, and then evaluated by expert judgment to obtain a hazard classification, resulting in a coherent and justifiable methodology. Moreover, the probabilistic nature of the proposed approach enables highlighting the uncertainty in the analysis. The proposed methodology involves the following stages: (1) collection of data for different NMs related to the endpoint of interest: each study related to each NM is referred as a Line of Evidence (LoE); (2) computation of weighted scores for each LoE: each LoE is weighted by a score calculated based on data quality and completeness criteria defined in the GRACIOUS project; (3) comparison and integration of the weighed LoEs for each NM: A Monte Carlo resampling approach is adopted to quantitatively and probabilistically integrate the weighted evidence; and (4) assignment of each NM to a hazard class: according to the results, each NM is assigned to one of the classes defined by the CLP regulation. Furthermore, to facilitate the integration and the classification of the weighted LoEs, an online R tool was developed. Finally, the approach was tested against an endpoint relevant to CLP (Aquatic Toxicity) using data retrieved from the eNanoMapper database, results obtained were consistent to results in REACH registration dossiers and in recent literature.

Quantitative human health risk assessment along the lifecycle of nano-scale copper-based wood preservatives.

The use of nano-scale copper oxide (CuO) and basic copper carbonate (Cu2(OH)2CO3) in both ionic and micronized wood preservatives has raised concerns about the potential of these substances to cause adverse humans health effects. To address these concerns, we performed quantitative (probabilistic) human health risk assessment (HHRA) along the lifecycles of these formulations used in antibacterial and antifungal wood coatings and impregnations by means of the EU FP7 SUN project's Decision Support System (SUNDS, www.sunds.gd). The results from the risk analysis revealed inhalation risks from CuO in exposure scenarios involving workers handling dry powders and performing sanding operations as well as potential ingestion risks for children exposed to nano Cu2(OH)2CO3 in a scenario involving hand-to-mouth transfer of the substance released from impregnated wood. There are, however, substantial uncertainties in these results, so some of the identified risks may stem from the safety margin of extrapolation to fill data gaps and might be resolved by additional testing. Our stochastic approach successfully communicated the contribution of different sources of uncertainty in the risk assessment. The main source of uncertainty was the extrapolation from short to long-term exposure, which was necessary due to the lack of (sub)chronic in vivo studies with CuO and Cu2(OH)2CO3. Considerable uncertainties also stemmed from the use of default inter- and intra-species extrapolation factors.